Video: researchers use light to defibrillate arrhythmias in mice

Scientists from Johns Hopkins University and the University of Bonn in Germany have applied advances in optogenetics to terminate arrhythmias in mice.

In a new study published online yesterday in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, authors prove the concept of optogenetic defibrillation, where epicardial illumination can effectively terminate ventricular tachycardia—a potential alternative to implantable defibrillators.

"Strong electrical shocks can damage the heart and cause severe pain," write the authors. "Our results... could potentially be translated into humans to achieve nondamaging and pain-free termination of ventricular arrhythmia."

Continue reading Video: researchers use light to defibrillate arrhythmias in mice

Future of cardiology: personalized care through genetics?

Genetic arrhythmia programs are paving new roads for personalized cardiac care—from preventing unnecessary cautionary testing or treatment to improving screening.

Melvin Scheinman, MD—the first person to perform catheter ablation for arrhythmia in a human patient, now chief of the Comprehensive Genetic Arrhythmia Program at the University of California, San Francisco—believes genetic testing will lead to the "ultimate form of personalized medicine," writes Gregory A. Freeman of HealthLeaders Magazine.

"If you examine the genetic background of a patient, you may be able to identify sensitivity to specific drugs, propensity for developing some very serious heart disorders, and at the same time rule out those same things for other people," said Scheinman to HealthLeaders.

"That is really what personalized medicine is all about—delivering the right care to the patient because you truly understand the patient and don't have to treat him or her as just a member of a group with certain statistical risks."

A proliferation of genetic arrhythmia programs "across the country" have been introducing new, measured responses to a sudden cardiac death in the family—preventive healthcare for some, but not all family members.

Continue reading Future of cardiology: personalized care through genetics?

Taking Telemetry Out of the Hospital Improves Outcomes, Reduces Alarm Fatigue

A new study suggests the use of an off-site cardiac telemetry central monitoring unit (CMU) could improve telemetry alarms for non-intensive care unit patients and reduce the number of monitored patients—without increasing cardiopulmonary arrest events.

The study, published August 2 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, studied all non-intensive care unit patients at Cleveland Clinic and three other regional hospitals over a period of thirteen months. An off-site CMU applied "standardized cardiac telemetry" for 99,048 patients during that time.

The Data

Among the study's population, emergency response team (ERT) activation occurred for 3,243 patients. 979 of those patients had rhythm or rate changes occurring up to one hour prior to the ERT activation. The CMU detected and provided accurate notification for 772—or 79 percent—of those events, according to the study's abstract.

For 105 patients, the CMU provided "discretionary direct ERT notification" for events requiring urgent clinical intervention, reads the abstract. Slightly more than one in four of those patients went on to experience cardiopulmonary arrest events—27 patients, or 26 percent. Return to circulation was achieved in 25 of those patients, or 93 percent.

Telemetry standardization also reduced the number of patients monitored by 15.5 percent per week through eliminating low-risk patients.

How the Central Monitoring Unit Works

The study's model used one monitoring technician to provide continuous cardiac monitoring for up to 48 patients, providing blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and respiratory rate notifications on request, according to the JAMA media release. A lead technician also provided oversight and supervision for real-time rhythm interpretation.

Continue reading Taking Telemetry Out of the Hospital Improves Outcomes, Reduces Alarm Fatigue

Comparing New Leadless Pacemakers: Micra vs. Nanostim

On the back of encouraging Phase III trial results, Medtronic's "Micra" leadless pacemaker was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in April, beating St. Jude Medical's "Nanostim" to approval—but does it have more limitations?

For leadless pacemakers, size matters.

Despite being small for pacemakers, both devices are rather large for transfemoral catheterization—the access site for both devices.

Sheaths for St. Jude Medical's Nanostim device measure 18 French or 6mm in diameter, to which Dr. Prapa Kanagaratnam of St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London expressed some concern. "An 18-F sheath is a big sheath to put in the leg," he said to heartwire.

"A lot of the patients we're putting these devices into are small, elderly people," said Dr. Kanagaratnam. "So it's still a procedure that we feel anxious about."

Continue reading Comparing New Leadless Pacemakers: Micra vs. Nanostim